- #PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 HOW TO#
- #PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 MANUAL#
- #PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 SOFTWARE#
- #PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 LICENSE#
Until I solve that one, using both is quite pointless.
#PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 HOW TO#
But unless you know how to get around this – and I, for one, don’t (yet) – neither of them recognises the changes already made in the other one.
#PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 MANUAL#
I will admit that the AUTO applications of those features don’t always work properly and manual has to take control, but once you get the hang of it, that’s no problem.Īt a theoretical level, you can correct in DxO PhotoLab (or OpticsPro) and feed the result into LR. I’ve actually had to curb my use of it, because sometimes a shot looks better with at least SOME convergence in perspectives, and sometimes the true horizontal line actually looks wrong. No home should be without ViewPoint, it’s amazing good at sorting out (a) lens distortion (they can match to practically any lens any of us is likely to be using), (b) horizon lines, (c) verticals and horizontals, and (d) perspectives – both vertical & horizontal. Two programs I DO use are DxO PhotoLab (formerly DxO OpticsPro) and DxO ViewPoint. And I can’t see myself buying (or needing) anything further from Adobe. I still use Photoshop for a couple of purposes – finishing off, after I’ve edited elsewhere. Some of the pros swear by it – so obviously there are two sides to that one. I hate their catalogue system, it’s a complete pain in the butt and slows things down terribly. If you can, with SilkyPix, good luck to you. Stuff from that cam takes a lot more effort than the stuff my gear produces!Īdrian, I really haven’t found ANY one system that does everything I want. That smug bit of self appraisal doesn’t help when I turn to post processing my wife’s photos, but I cannot persuade her to ditch her 12-year old Olympus Stylus 720SW, which she absolutely adores and won’t part with. Pictures as smooth as silk? A SilkyPix overview from South-East Asia.Īnd before you get indigestion reading it all, I am increasingly finding I need less and less post processing, because I am getting better at “getting it right” in the camera.
#PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 SOFTWARE#
It is quite lengthy, so has been broken down into sections to try and make it easier to digest, and I hope others may find it useful and give the software a try – the results can be truly excellent. The article linked below gives an overview of some its features, how to use it for those more familiar with other software, and some insight into its strengths and weaknesses. With Adobe’s recent changes to the Lightroom product and their charging model, together with a number of new entrants to the market with new raw development and editing tools, it seemed like an ideal time to write a review of SilkyPix.
It has now become my primary raw development tool for almost all my photography, and I have never really understood some of the negativity and hubris about its features and user interface.
#PICKTORIAL 3 VS LUMINAR 2018 LICENSE#
As a result of my frustration I decided to purchase a license for Ichikawa software’s “SilkyPix Studio Developer”. When I owned a Fuji X system camera I became frustrated with Adobe Lightroom as the output was particularly bad, and even when I paid for a newer version which claimed to give better results with X Trans raw files, they were still mediocre at best and the software was very sluggish. Often it seems that most users choose Adobe because they are market leader and there is a wealth of “information” available online in the shape of video tutorials and guides. Penang, Malaysia : Temple door mural 1/80s f2.8 ISO100 : SilkyPix : Faithful Standard Colourįinding a raw development and editing tool that’s right for you should probably be a fairly personal choice, as different people like to work in different ways and have different end goals.
0 kommentar(er)
